joyplot for GSEA result

I am very glad to find that someone figure out how to use ggjoy with ggtree.

I really love ggjoy and believe it can be a good tool to visualize gene set enrichment (GSEA) result. DOSE/clusterProfiler support several visualization methods.

[Bioc 3.5] NEWS of my BioC packages

I have 8 packages published within the Bioconductor project.

A new package treeio was included in BioC 3.5 release.

dotplot for GSEA result

For GSEA analysis, we are familar with the above figure which shows the running enrichment score. But for most of the software, it lack of visualization method to summarize the whole enrichment result.

In DOSE (and related tools including clusterProfiler, ReactomePA and meshes), we provide enrichMap and cnetplot to summarize GSEA result.

showCategory parameter for visualizing compareCluster output

I am using dotplot() to visualize results from enrichGO(), enrichDO(), enricher() and compareCluster() in clusterProfiler R package. When specifying showCategory, I get the right number of categories except with the results of compareCluser().

In my case, I use compareCluster() on a list of 3 elements:

List of 3
 $ All : chr [1:1450] "89886" "29923" "100132891" "101410536" ...
 $ g1  : chr [1:858] "89886" "29923" "100132891" "101410536" ...
 $ g2: chr [1:592] "5325" "170691" "29953" "283392" ...
CompareGO_BP=compareCluster(ClusterList, fun="enrichGO", pvalueCutoff=0.01, pAdjustMethod="BH",,ont="BP",readable=T)

dotplot(CompareGO_BP, showCategory=10, title="GO - Biological Process")

I ask for 10 categories, but I get 15 categories in All, 8 categories in g1 and 12 categories in g2. None of the categories, neither the sum of the categories are 10…

Is the option showCategory working in the case of comparison? Am I missing something here?

And which categories precisely will it plot? the most significant whatever my 3 cases or the most significant of each case?

The question was posted in Bioconductor support site. It seems quite confusing and I think I need to write a post to clarify it.

[Bioc 34] NEWS of my BioC packages

I have 7 packages published within the Bioconductor project.

A new package meshes was included in BioC 3.4 release.

leading edge analysis

leading edge and core enrichment

Leading edge analysis reports Tags to indicate the percentage of genes contributing to the enrichment score, List to indicate where in the list the enrichment score is attained and Signal for enrichment signal strength.

It would also be very interesting to get the core enriched genes that contribute to the enrichment.

Now DOSE, clusterProfiler and ReactomePA all support leading edge analysis and report core enriched genes.

[Bioc 33] NEWS of my BioC packages

Today is my birthday and it happened to be the release day of Bioconductor 3.3. It’s again the time to reflect what I’ve done in the past year.

convert biological ID with KEGG API using clusterProfiler


clusterProfiler can convert biological IDs using OrgDb object via the bitr function. Now I implemented another function, bitr_kegg for converting IDs through KEGG API.

hg <- gcSample[[1]]

## [1] "4597"  "7111"  "5266"  "2175"  "755"   "23046"

eg2np <- bitr_kegg(hg, fromType='kegg', toType='ncbi-proteinid', organism='hsa')

## Warning in bitr_kegg(hg, fromType = "kegg", toType = "ncbi-proteinid",
## organism = "hsa"): 3.7% of input gene IDs are fail to map...


##     kegg ncbi-proteinid
## 1   8326      NP_003499
## 2  58487   NP_001034707
## 3 139081      NP_619647
## 4  59272      NP_068576
## 5    993      NP_001780
## 6   2676      NP_001487

np2up <- bitr_kegg(eg2np[,2], fromType='ncbi-proteinid', toType='uniprot', organism='hsa')


##   ncbi-proteinid uniprot
## 1      NP_005457  O75586
## 2      NP_005792  P41567
## 3      NP_005792  Q6IAV3
## 4      NP_037536  Q13421
## 5      NP_006054  O60662
## 6   NP_001092002  O95398

The ID type (both fromType & toType) should be one of ‘kegg’, ‘ncbi-geneid’, ‘ncbi-proteinid’ or ‘uniprot’. The ‘kegg’ is the primary ID used in KEGG database. The data source of KEGG was from NCBI. A rule of thumb for the ‘kegg’ ID is entrezgene ID for eukaryote species and Locus ID for prokaryotes.

KEGG Module Enrichment Analysis

KEGG MODULE is a collection of manually defined functional units, called KEGG modules and identified by the M numbers, used for annotation and biological interpretation of sequenced genomes. There are four types of KEGG modules:

  • pathway modules – representing tight functional units in KEGG metabolic pathway maps, such as M00002 (Glycolysis, core module involving three-carbon compounds)
  • structural complexes – often forming molecular machineries, such as M00072 (Oligosaccharyltransferase)
  • functional sets – for other types of essential sets, such as M00360 (Aminoacyl-tRNA synthases, prokaryotes)
  • signature modules – as markers of phenotypes, such as M00363 (EHEC pathogenicity signature, Shiga toxin)

GO analysis using clusterProfiler

clusterProfiler supports over-representation test and gene set enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology. It supports GO annotation from OrgDb object, GMT file and user’s own data.

support many species

In github version of clusterProfiler, enrichGO and gseGO functions removed the parameter organism and add another parameter OrgDb, so that any species that have OrgDb object available can be analyzed in clusterProfiler. Bioconductor have already provide OrgDb for about 20 species, see, and users can build OrgDb via AnnotationHub.